Is Windows Defender Good Enough

I mostly write reviews of VPNs, articles and features about VPNs, and responses to emails (of varying degrees of hostility) from or about VPN services. In most all of these contexts, I've tried to explain that VPNs (although fantabulous for securing your internet traffic) don't supercede password managers, antivirus suites, or the use of ii-cistron authentication (2FA). But recently a reader asked me if I was implying that the security software from Microsoft was somehow defective. That'south a question worth because.

Hither'due south what our intrepid reader sent me. (Annotation that this excerpt has been edited for brevity and to remove personal information.)

You recommend tertiary-party anti-malware, McAfee, Bitdefender, and Kaspersky in ane of your manufactures. Are you lot suggesting that Microsoft Security Essentials on Windows 10 is not sufficient?

The short answer is that the bundled security solution from Microsoft is pretty good at most things. Only the longer answer is that it could do better—and you can still do better with a third-party antivirus app.

Simply How Well Does Windows Defender Perform?

For those who are unaware, Microsoft Security Essentials was antivirus software included by Microsoft with Windows starting in 2009, until it was supplanted by Microsoft Windows Defender Security Center. With this software, Microsoft ensured that customers would take some kind of protection from the moment they first booted up their computer. Information technology costs them nothing and doesn't require them to have any action.

When Microsoft'south security offering starting time went under the microscope, it didn't impress. But information technology improved over time, so much and so that it started to snag tiptop scores from contained lab assessments. In his review, my colleague Neil Rubenking constitute that Microsoft's offering does an excellent job detecting and preventing malicious software.

Now, Defender hasn't totally stolen the spotlight away from the McAfees and the Bitdefenders of the world. Y'all could chalk that up to decades of name recognition for competitors, but testing has revealed some notable shortcomings in Windows Defender. We establish that the SmartScreen filter in Edge blocked only 68 percent of phishing sites, for example. That's particularly bad compared with the 89 and 90 percent blocked by Firefox and Chrome. In those tests, Kaspersky and McAfee blocked 100 percentage of the phishing sites.

That'southward especially disappointing because phishing attacks can do a lot of impairment, and they don't require a lot of technical sophistication on the function of attackers. A phishing site tricks people into voluntarily handing over personal data—similar credit card numbers—by impersonating a legitimate website. For more on this particular threat, you tin read our story on how to avoid phishing attacks.

Windows Defender too doesn't cover the same breadth of products that 3rd-political party security companies do. The company that sells you antivirus software can besides provide fill-in protection, a countersign director, a VPN, parental control, and more as well, often rolled up in a security suite.

Still, the ascension of Windows Defender is a skillful story. We conclude our review thusly:

Recommended past Our Editors

Use a VPN Even When You're Safe

Do You Really Need to Buy an Antivirus App or a VPN Anymore? Image

"We used to say Windows Defender is better than nothing. At present, we're willing to say it's pretty darn good. Some of its lab examination scores are splendid at present, though it took a while to reach this point. […] It earned a great score in our hands-on malware protection test but didn't do so well at detecting phishing frauds."

A Matter of Perspective

I'm always glad when I get a reader question that I can answer definitively. I'm even happier when I tin signal to the piece of work of an eminent colleague like Rubenking to back me upwards. Merely I want to address directly this reader's question as well.

I realize that even when I tangentially recommend security products, I should strive to brand the recommendations as attainable as possible. Windows Defender is a cracking example. It's something most people already have, works well, and doesn't crave you to pay annihilation (beyond the toll of Windows, at least).

This is especially important considering the two biggest obstacles preventing people from adopting good security practices in their lives are money and endeavour. Security software is not fun to buy and merely a piddling fun to use. It'southward also expensive! These days, we're expected to pay subscriptions for the videos we watch, the games we play, and now security software. We're rapidly approaching a future where security and especially privacy area luxury afforded to the people who can pay actress.

It shouldn't have to exist that way, and it doesn't have to be. Loftier-quality free security products do exist, and Windows Defender is a adept way to continue you and your calculator safe. Information technology is, however, not the all-time. For that, we recommend Bitdefender Antivirus Plus, Kaspersky Anti-Virus, and Webroot SecureAnywhere AntiVirus, among others. If you can afford them, these options will provide far more protection.

Our Peak Antivirus Picks

Like What You lot're Reading?

Sign upwards for SecurityWatch newsletter for our elevation privacy and security stories delivered right to your inbox.

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Y'all may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.